Small text iconNormal text iconLarge text icon

INTERACTION

 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MembersMembers   GroupsGroups   RegisterRegister 
 User Control PanelUser Control Panel      LoginLogin 


All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 8:29 am
Posts: 549
Location: wakefield
From a review of 'Seeking a Friend for the End of the World' in IZ242:

Quote:
If you didn't know, you'd never believe that such a character, and such a relationship, could have been written by a woman; but at least it shows that anything guys can do, women can do worse.


OK, well this woman's lost for words right now. I'm reduced to - WTF?!!! (And it's the first time I've actually said that.)

_________________
http://www.alisonlittlewood.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 8:50 pm
Posts: 731
I'm assuming that isn't a woman reviewer...

Rather harsh, to say the least!

_________________
www.andrew-hook.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 11:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 2:06 pm
Posts: 1041
Location: Portsmouth
Oh dear.

Men and women can write great stuff. Men and women can write shite. Fair enough. But surely men and women can write about any character in any relationship?

Mind you, I shouldn't be sticking my oar in - not read the review yet.

_________________
http://probablymonsters.wordpress.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 11:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 2:06 pm
Posts: 1041
Location: Portsmouth
And don't even start me on "worse". As if one writer can stand for an entire gender/sex anyway.

There, that's my other oar. Chucking them both overboard now and drifting...

_________________
http://probablymonsters.wordpress.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:05 pm
Posts: 443
Location: Birmingham
He's saying that Keira Knightley's character is a typical movie male wish fulfilment fantasy type - the beautiful young lady who takes an inexplicable interest in a middle-aged man, who cares more about sleeping with him than her own life - and the reviewer's surprised to see a woman producing that kind of inherently sexist stuff. Maybe he's wrong to be surprised to see a woman writing something sexist, but I don't think it's problematic for him to express that surprise...

_________________
Theaker's Quarterly Fiction


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 1:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 8:29 am
Posts: 549
Location: wakefield
I think it is a problem, when a specific scenario - of an individual woman writing a poorly judged character or situation - is generalised onto the entire population.

Quote:
but at least it shows that anything guys can do, women can do worse.


As a statement it is at best poorly judged in its own right.

_________________
http://www.alisonlittlewood.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 5:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:05 pm
Posts: 443
Location: Birmingham
Right, sorry - I was just looking at the first bit.

_________________
Theaker's Quarterly Fiction


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 8:29 am
Posts: 549
Location: wakefield
Ah no, I do hope you're right and that's the way it was intended. It came across to me more negatively though, and I suspect it will to other readers too. Trouble is, it's the kind of thing that could impact on the way people view the magazine.

There's something about that 'women' vs. the pallyness of 'guys' that made me uneasy, too - it sounds all, 'it's a boys' club, love - move along.'

As I say, I hope you're right, but if that was the idea it should really have been better expressed.

_________________
http://www.alisonlittlewood.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 5:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 8:29 am
Posts: 549
Location: wakefield
Oh lord, and now I see in a review of 'The Victim' in Black Static 30:

Quote:
The last twenty minutes or so promote confusion as The Victim bursts its plot seams with ugly bloat like some flabby tart squeezed in a bodycon dress two sizes smaller than required.


Erm - is it *really* necessary?!

_________________
http://www.alisonlittlewood.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group